Research

Humanitarian Protection Is Not Immigration Selection: Why the United States Needs Both

An examination of the different purposes of protection from persecution and employment-based immigration selection, and how both can concern the same person while retaining distinct eligibility standards.

AuthorsIgor Leonov
Manuscript / version date2026-09-27
AvailabilityИсследование · SSRN

Research question & overview

The article separates two public questions: whether a person qualifies for protection and whether they qualify for employment-based immigration. Education and experience can matter to the latter without substituting for evidence of persecution.

It compares statutory purposes, U.S. immigration statistics and research on refugee integration. Economic agency is considered together with the conditions institutions create for working and using qualifications.

The proposed approach preserves distinct eligibility decisions while coordinating information, relevant evidence verification and integration services. It offers an analytical framework rather than an assessment of an individual application.

Read the work

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.7533600

Bibliographic reference

Igor Leonov. (2026). Humanitarian Protection Is Not Immigration Selection: Why the United States Needs Both. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7533600

Related topics

Return to research catalogue

Documents and links